[uClinux-dev] Threading and synchronization questions

Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo.org
Fri Feb 27 21:59:55 EST 2009

On Friday 27 February 2009 15:16:45 Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:17:19AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > file descriptors are not shared resources.  whatever a child does with
> > them will not affect the parent.
> I was hoping that was the case.  It did seem like vfork + exac would
> loose a lot of purpose if file descriptors weren't duplicated by vfork.

yeah, it would make redirecting of std* fd's real painful (like daemonizing 
code).  i didnt think vforked children having their own fd's would work under 
no-mmu until i thought about it a bit more.  the fd indirection with the 
kernel can be thought of a little like a mmu: the real resources are 
translated to per-process identifiers.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.uclinux.org/pipermail/uclinux-dev/attachments/20090227/a0c75ce1/attachment.sig>

More information about the uClinux-dev mailing list