[uClinux-dev] BusyBox issues
Robert S. Grimes
rsg at alum.mit.edu
Wed Feb 21 19:45:06 EST 2007
Hi,
I'm not sure, but it seems BusyBox is difficult to build. I don't
really know what is going on, but here's my experience so far.
The first time I attempted to build uClinux (uClinux-dist-20070130,
target board M5329EVB, ColdFire 5329), I selected a goodly number of
BusyBox "commands". It would not build, seeming to fail during
linking. So I reconfigured without it, and it all built fine.
Then, I needed insmod, which seems to only ,be in BusyBox. I added it,
selecting insmod (and I think find) and it built properly this time.
Later, I added some more, and then it would not build again!
So, I removed BusyBox, built the uClinux image just fine. Then, I
reconfigured to include it, and just insmod, and it built again.
I wish I wrote down the errors, but I recall they were of the form
'main_more not found' (or perhaps 'more_main'?). Others include
main_ls, main_ls, main_mv (or again, the other order?). So I'm
wondering: is there some sort of conflict between BusyBox "commands" and
their "standalone" equivalents? Or am I missing something? It seems
building BusyBox is rather fragile, but I think it is something I'm
doing wrong - is that right?
Thanks, all!
-Bob
More information about the uClinux-dev
mailing list