[uClinux-dev] Question regarding ucLinux updateforucGardener/simm(fwd)
tom at cyberiansoftware.com
Wed Nov 28 16:08:32 EST 2001
Claudio Duffini wrote:
> Tom Walsh wrote:
> > Thank you. Do you mean that the latest version of the nfs protocol is
> > version 3? Somehow I assumed that there was a version 4?
> According to the IETF, this is the latest v4 RFC :
> 3010 NFS version 4 Protocol. S. Shepler, B. Callaghan, D. Robinson, R.
> Thurlow, C. Beame, M. Eisler, D. Noveck. December 2000. (Format:
> TXT=450434 bytes) (Obsoletes RFC1813, RFC1094) (Status: PROPOSED
> But it seems too early to implement it in commercial Un*x(es).
> We must go with v3, for now.
I would not be surprised at all to find it already implemented in the
> Claudio Duffini |IW3HE| Systems Integrator
> Studio 3/98 Snc (C.E.D. Ospedale 'Sacro Cuore' - ONETF Group)
> WinErr: 001 Windows loaded - System in danger.
> WinErr: 002 Erroneous error - Nothing is wrong.
> WinErr: 003 Multitasking attempted - System confused.
> WinErr: 004 Broken window - Watch out for glass fragments.
> WinErr: 005 Window closed - Do not look outside.
> WinErr: 006 Window open - Do not look inside.
> WinErr: 007 Reserved for future mistakes by our developers.
> WinErr: 008 Err recording errcodes - Additional errors will be lost.
> WinErr: 009 Memory Error - What? Tell me again.
> This message resent by the uclinux-dev at uclinux.org list server http://www.uClinux.org/
Tom Walsh - WN3L - Embedded Systems Consultant
"Windows? No thanks, I have work to do..."
This message resent by the uclinux-dev at uclinux.org list server http://www.uClinux.org/
More information about the uClinux-dev