[uClinux-dev] Increased stack usage on uClinux 2.4.x compared to uClinux 2.0.38
michiel.thuys at intersil.com
Fri Nov 16 08:13:10 EST 2001
Thanks David! This solves my problems.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David McCullough [mailto:davidm at snapgear.com]
> Sent: vrijdag 16 november 2001 1:01
> To: uclinux-dev at uclinux.org
> Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] Increased stack usage on uClinux 2.4.x
> compared to uClinux 2.0.38
> Jivin Thuys, Michiel lays it down ...
> > Hi all,
> > We have a number of apps running on an ARM9 uClinux 2.0.38
> platform and
> > are now porting these to uClinux 2.4.10. Some applications,
> e.g. boa,
> > need a much larger stack on 2.4.10 as compared to 2.0.38.
> For boa, we
> > had to increase the stack from 8k to 32k. We use the same
> toolchain for
> > both kernel versions.
> > Has anyone experienced the same thing? If so, what is causing this?
> The problem is in the C library using values from the kernel,
> that, under
> 2.4 are much larger. I can't remember which defines cause
> the problems,
> whatever changes were needed for uC-libc are in the latest
> uClinux-distribution tarball. Look at PATH_MAX, NR_OPEN, OPEN_MAX and
> anything liker that ;-)
> After the fixes we didn't have to up the stack size on any
> app under 2.4
> (which is the way it should be :-)
> David McCullough: Ph: +61 7 3435 2815 http://www.SnapGear.com
> davidm at snapgear.com Fx: +61 7 3891 3630 825 Stanley St.,
> W'gabba QLD 4102, Oz
> This message resent by the uclinux-dev at uclinux.org list
> server http://www.uClinux.org/
This message resent by the uclinux-dev at uclinux.org list server http://www.uClinux.org/
More information about the uClinux-dev